InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Mexico: Litigating for reliable criteria

When talking about reserva rights – a legal institution exclusive to the Mexican legal system, which protects a variety of assets, such as titles of publications or broadcasts, among others– there is a problem that stands out: an absence of certainty regarding the criteria used by the authority (the Mexican Copyright Office, or INDAUTOR) when examining applications.

Indeed, INDAUTOR's criteria tend to vary on a case-by-case basis, partially because reserva-related litigation is uncommon. This, in turn, leads to an absence of judicial precedents that could be used as guidelines by the authority.

For comparison, the authority responsible for trade mark rights (the Mexican Industrial Property Institute, or IMPI) usually applies well-established criteria, largely based on judicial precedents, as trade mark-related litigations are the bulk of IP contentious proceedings in Mexico.

As an example, recently a federal court overturned an INDAUTOR ruling which had denied protection for a magazine title. The proposed title comprised the name of a fictional character, but the protection was denied because it was considered that, potentially, the title could be also the "name of a person".

In this case, the court reasoned that while the law prohibits granting reservas for "names of persons used in isolation", such prohibition should be understood in connection with "existing individuals", and was not applicable for titles that could be the name of a person whose existence was not demonstrated.

This ruling hardly seems ground-breaking, since IMPI has applied the same criterion for years, in connection with a similar prohibition for trademark registrations. However, it was the first ruling of its kind regarding reservas.

Cases like this exemplify why reserva-related litigation should be encouraged, since the existence of judicial precedents would allow future titleholders to have certainty over the criteria that will be applied by the authority in each case.

Adrián Martínez

Pedro Luis Ogazón No 17
Col San Angel
01000 México DF
Tel: +5255 53 22 30 00
Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01



Managing IP


ManagingIP profile

"In the end, the hearing, which was scheduled to be heard over four days, lasted little more than one and a half, a…

Jan 18 2018 03:44 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

RT @mdloney: UPC update: German Bar Association says constitutional complaint inadmissible

Jan 18 2018 02:24 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Our weekly IP news round-up includes Starbucks winning an EU General Court case, an Apple motion to sanction at the…

Jan 18 2018 01:59 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog

null null null

null null null

End of Year 2017

Tribal sovereign immunity: Taking a wrecking ball to the IPR system

The lawyer behind Allergan’s controversial transfer of patents to a Native American tribe says others are “lining up to do deals”. But, Michael Loney asks, will the PTAB rule that sovereign immunity applies in these types of deals?

Most read articles